Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site.... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Recovering unlawful State aid after recipient´s transfer of business: New developments

The goal of the State aid rules is to ensure that there are no distortions in competition between undertakings. Consequently, the primary requirement of recovery of unlawful State aid is to recover it effectively and immediately. For this reason, the recovery of unlawful aid may require the recovery to be extended to an undertaking to which an undertaking that originally received the aid has transferred or sold part of its assets.

The purpose of the article is to examine in which circumstances the recovery may be extended to an undertaking to which an undertaking that originally received the aid has transferred or sold part of its assets. Also, the main legal principles and doctrines behind the recovery process are briefly examined. Especially, the article looks into the recent Commission decisions and EU case law concerning Finnish bus services and Slovakian chemical industry.

In conclusion remarks, it is argued that the buyer should be able to demonstrate, instead of the Commission, that the business transaction certainly takes place at market price. As price of the transfer is just one of the factors that may be taken into consideration, even the market price does not automatically preclude economic continuity if the assets are purchased in their entirety and used in the same manner as before.

Article by associate Tatu Kärhä has been published in Europarättslig tidskrift´s publication 4/2021.

Tatu Kärhä
Associate
+358 44 989 9277
tatu.karha@hpp.fi

Share content

Read also